区域经济

新疆农机购置补贴政策执行效率评价——基于DEA-Malmquist模型

  • 辛冲冲 ,
  • 唐洪松 ,
  • 邵乐
展开
  • 1.中南财经政法大学 财政税务学院,湖北 武汉 430074;
    2.新疆农业大学 经济与贸易学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830052
辛冲冲(1988-),男,博士研究生,研究方向:财政理论与政策、区域经济发展;唐洪松(1990-),男,博士研究生,研究方向:环境与可持续发展;邵乐(1990-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向:农业经济理论与政策。

收稿日期: 2016-11-12

  网络出版日期: 2020-11-23

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目“西部民族地区农机购置补贴政策的经济效应研究”(71063021);国家自然科学基金资助项目“基于生产要素配置视角的中国棉花生产增长路径选择研究”(71203191);新疆维吾尔自治区人文社会科学重点研究基地——干旱区农村发展研究中心项目“新疆强农惠农政策绩效评价”(XJEDU030114Y02);新疆维吾尔自治区研究生科研创新项目“农村金融支持新疆‘三农’经济发展问题研究”(XJGRI2015085)

On the Implementation Efficiency of Xinjiang Agricultural Machinery Purchase Subsidy Policy ——Based on DEA-Malmquist Model

  • Xin Chongchong ,
  • Tang Hongsong ,
  • Shao Le
Expand
  • 1. Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430074,China;
    2. Xinjiang Agricultural University,Urumqi 830052,China

Received date: 2016-11-12

  Online published: 2020-11-23

摘要

本文运用DEA-Malmquist模型,从时序发展及区域异质性特征两个视角对新疆农机购置补贴政策执行后的效率和全要素生产率发展变化予以测度。结果表明:(1)从时序发展视角来看,新疆在2004年—2014年农机购置补贴政策实施样本期内的综合技术效率(TE)逐年得到提升,关键在于规模效率(SE)提高的有利驱使;且样本期间补贴政策执行后的全要素生产率(TFP)也基本呈上升态势,年均上升3.4%,其中技术进步年均提升3%,是新疆农机购置补贴政策运行全要素生产率逐年上升的主要驱动力。(2)从区域差异分布来看,新疆各地州(市)综合技术效率值存在明显差异性,使其呈散状式分布,主要原因在于规模效率的区域差异化;此外,北疆各地区补贴政策实施全要素生产率增长速度明显高于东疆、南疆地区,而制约南疆地区补贴政策实施效率提高的主要原因是技术进步发展缓慢。为此,新疆有必要适时调整政策导向,在加大农机购置补贴力度的基础上,进一步提升区域间的协调发展,以为实现新疆农业现代化奠定坚实的基础。

本文引用格式

辛冲冲 , 唐洪松 , 邵乐 . 新疆农机购置补贴政策执行效率评价——基于DEA-Malmquist模型[J]. 新疆财经, 2017 , 0(1) : 50 -59 . DOI: 10.16716/j.cnki.65-1030/f.2017.01.006

Abstract

This paper uses DEA model and Malmquist model to attempt to measure the efficiency and the development of total factor productivity of Xinjiang agricultural machinery purchase subsidy policy from the two perspectives of time sequence development and regional heterogeneity. The results show that: (1) From the perspective of time series development, the overall technical efficiency (TE) of Xinjiang policy implementation within the sample period from 2004 to 2014 has improved year by year, the key driving force lies in the favorable drive of the scale efficiency (SE) increase. Similarly, the TFP (Total Factor Productivity) within the sample period also basically showed an upward trend with an average annual increase of 3.4%.And the technological progress with an average annual increase of 3% was the main driving force of its increasing year by year.(2) From the distribution of regional differences, there exist significant differences of the comprehensive technical efficiency value in all parts of Xinjiang province (city), making it a bulk type distribution.The main reason lies in the scale efficiency of regional differences.In addition, the TFP growth rate of subsidy policy implementation in northern area was significantly higher than that of eastern and southern regions in Xinjiang. Yet the main factors restricting the efficiency of the implementation of the subsidy policy in southern region lied in the slow development of technology progress.Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the guide effect of the policy for Xinjiang. On the basis of increasing the purchase of agricultural subsidies, it needs to further enhance the coordinated development between regions in order to lay a solid foundation to realize the agricultural modernization in Xinjiang.

参考文献

[1]Cole R.Gustafson,Peter J.Barry and Steven T.Sonka.Machinery Investment Decisions:A Simulated Analysis for Cash Grain Farms[J].Journal of Agricultural Economics,1988,13(2):244-253.
[2]Orachos Napasintuwong,Robert D.Emerson.Institutional and Socioleconomic Model of Farm Mechanization and Foreign Workers,Selected Paper Prepared for Presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting[R].Providence,Rhode Island,July,2005:1-21.
[3]John Kerr.Price Policy,Irreversible Investment and the Scale of Agricultural Mechanization in Egypt[J].Research in Middle East Economics,2003(5):161-185.
[4]Abell M.,Cedillo P..Mechanization in Asia:Statistics and Principles for Success[J].Agricultural Mechanization in Asia,Africa and Latin America,1999,30(4):70-75.
[5]Krishna Reni,Thongsawatwong.Status and Trend of Farm Mechanization in Thailand[J].Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America,2004,35(1):59-66.
[6]Usha Tuteja.Utilisation of Agricultural Input Subsidies by Scheduled Castevis-a-Visnon-Scheduled Caste Farmers in Haryana[J].Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics,2004(4):200-213.
[7]白人朴,刘敏.农业机械购置补贴政策研究[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2004.
[8]张睿,高焕文.我国农业机械化经营收入对农民增收的贡献[J].农机化研究,2008(8):1-5.
[9]吴昭雄.基于农户视角的农业机械购置补贴政策关联度分析——来自湖北省农户问卷调查的分析[J].农业技术经济,2011(8):107-114.
[10]李红,张敏.大型农机购置补贴政策对农民收入的影响分析[J].农机化研究,2008(7):57-62.
[11]韩剑锋,等.我国农机购置补贴政策增收效应实证分析[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社科版)2010(9):85-90.
[12]侯玲玲,穆月英,张春晖.中国农业补贴政策及其实施效果分析[J].中国农学通报,2007(10):297-302.
[13]陈林兴,方挺.农机购置补贴政策的成效、问题及对策[J].农机化研究,2011(8):1-5.
[14]鲍剑国,胡华亮,董道梅.农机购置补贴政策对农业总产值和农民收入影响的实证分析——以江苏省为例[J].经济研究导刊,2011,131(21):18-19.
[15]李军政,孙松林,谢方平.湖南省农业机械购置补贴实施成效分析[J].农机化研究,2011(3):62-69.
[16]颜玄洲,鸥一智,姬钰.江西农机具购置补贴政策实施效果分析[J].中国农机化,2011(5):28-31.
[17]朱志猛,等.黑龙江省农机购置补贴政策效果实证分析[J].河北农业大学学报(农林教育版),2013(5):116-120.
[18]辛冲冲,等.新疆农机化发展与农民增收效应关系研究——基于VAR模型[J].农机化研究,2015(8):242-248.
[19]李新仓.我国农机购置补贴政策实施的成效及优化对策研究——基于福建省的实证调研[J].农机化研究,2015(9):24-25.
[20]任朝军.基于AHP-模糊综合评判的农机购置补贴绩效评价研究[D].陕西:西北农林科技大学,2007.
[21]李红.农机购置补贴政策的经济学分析[D].新疆:新疆农业大学,2008.
[22]曹光桥,等.农业机械购置补贴对农户购机行为的影响——基于江苏省水稻种植业的实证分析[J].中国农村经济,2010(6):40-50.
[23]李农,万祎.我国农机购置补贴的宏观政策效应研究[J].农业经济问题,2010(12):79-84.
[24]吴昭雄,胡琬玲.基于农户视角的农机购置补贴政策评价及关联度分析[J].河北农机化,2012(6):59-63.
[25]谢模强.湖南农业机械购置补贴政策绩效评估初探[J].湖南农机,2011(9):9-12.
[26]周浩,李红.新疆农机购置补贴政策绩效区域差异研究[J].农机化研究,2014(2):46-49.
[27]郭姝宇.我国农机化制度变迁与发展的协同性研究[J].农机化研究,2013(8):1-6.
[28]洪自同.农业机械购置补贴政策对农户粮食生产行为的影响——基于福建的实证分析[J].农业技术经济,2012(11):41-48.
[29]吴芳.吉林省农机购置补贴政策的绩效评价[D].吉林:吉林大学,2013.
[30]张彩云.黑龙江省农机购置补贴政策绩效研究.[D].黑龙江:东北农业大学,2014.
文章导航

/