丝路研究

“丝绸之路经济带”沿线国家贸易投资便利化水平时空分析

  • 李新英 ,
  • 周姿汝
展开
  • 新疆财经大学 经济学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐830012
李新英(1972- -),女 ,教授,经济学博士,研究方向为中国(新疆)与中亚经贸。

收稿日期: 2020-02-17

  网络出版日期: 2020-10-26

基金资助

新疆维吾尔自治区人文社会科学基地重点项目“丝绸之路经济带沿线国家能源贸易合作效果与评价研究"(050115B01)

Time-and-space Analysis of the Level of Trade and Investment Facilitation in Countries along the Silk Road Economic Belt

  • Li Xinying ,
  • Zhou Ziru
Expand
  • Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics,Urumqi 830012,China

Received date: 2020-02-17

  Online published: 2020-10-26

摘要

贸易投资便利化是“丝绸之路经济带”建设的优先领域,也是全球经贸领域关注的热点问题。本文通过构建贸易投资便利化综合评价指标体系,运用主成分分析法对“丝绸之路经济带”沿线32个国家的贸易投资便利化水平进行了测度,揭示其时空特征:时间上,2009年—2018年沿线各国的贸易投资便利化水平有不同程度的提升;空间上,呈现出“欧洲最高,西亚较高,东亚、中亚和非洲较低,南亚最低”的空间特征。同时发现,沿线各国的便利化基础、国内外政治环境、经济发展水平及外交政策等因素是造成各国便利化水平时空差异的重要原因。因此,“丝绸之路经济带”沿线国家在开展经贸合作时应考虑地区差异,加快推进自贸区建设,推动沿线各国基础设施和营商环境改善,加强政策沟通,增进政治互信,为双多边经贸合作提供安全保障。

本文引用格式

李新英 , 周姿汝 . “丝绸之路经济带”沿线国家贸易投资便利化水平时空分析[J]. 新疆财经, 2020 , 0(5) : 70 -80 . DOI: 10.16716/j.cnki.65-1030/f.2020.05.007

Abstract

Trade and investment facilitation is a priority area for the construction of the Silk Road Economic Belt, and it is also a hot issue in the field of global trade and economic affairs. This paper constructs a set of trade and investment facilitation index system to measure the level of facilitation by using the principal component analysis method, reveals the space-time characteristics of trade and investment facilitation of 32 countries along the Silk Road Economic Belt. In time, 2009—2018, the level of trade and investment facilitation in countries along the route has been improved to varying degrees. In space, it shows the spatial features of "Europe is the highest, West Asia is higher, East Asia, Central Asia and Africa are lower, and South Asia is the lowest''. At the same time, it finds that factors such as the facilitation foundation, domestic and foreign political environment, economic development level and foreign policy of countries along the belt and Road are the important reasons for the temporal and spatial differences in facilitation levels among countries. Therefore, when carrying out economic and trade cooperation, countries along the Silk Road Economic Belt should take into account regional differences, accelerate the construction of free trade zones, promote the improvement of infrastructure and business environment, strengthen policy communication, enhance political mutual trust, and provide security guarantee for bilateral and multilateral economic and trade cooperation.

参考文献

[1] Wilson J S,Mann C L,Otsuki T.Trade Facilitation and Economic Development: A New Approach to Quantifying the Impact[J].The World Bank Economic Review,2003(3):367-389.
[2] 张亚斌,刘俊,李城霖.丝绸之路经济带贸易便利化测度及中国贸易潜力[J].财经科学,2016(5):112-122.
[3] 曾铮,周茜.贸易便利化测评体系及对我国出口的影响[J].国际经贸探索,2008(10):4-9.
[4] 高志刚,田丰.中巴经济走廊背景下贸易便利化水平对中巴出口贸易效率影响研究[J].南亚研究,2019(2):136-156.
[5] 陈继勇,刘燚爽.“一带一路”沿线国家贸易便利化对中国贸易潜力的影响[J].世界经济研究,2018(9):41-54.
[6] 刘斌,王乃嘉,李川川.贸易便利化与价值链参与——基于世界投入产出数据库的分析[J].财经研究,2019(10):73-85.
[7] 毛艳华,杨思维.21世纪海上丝绸之路贸易便利化合作与能力建设[J].国际经贸探索,2015(4):101-112.
[8] 谢娟娟,岳静.贸易便利化对中国—东盟贸易影响的实证分析[J].世界经济研究,2011(8):81-86.
[9] 沈铭辉. APEC投资便利化进程——基于投资便利化行动计划[J].国际经济合作,2009(4):41-45.
[10] 李文韬. APEC贸易投资便利化合作进展评估与中国的策略选择[J].亚太经济,2011(4):13-17.
[11] 刘重力,杨宏.APEC贸易投资便利化最新进展及中国的策略选择[J].亚太经济,2014(2):26-32.
[12] 张亚斌. “一带一路”投资便利化与中国对外直接投资选择——基于跨国面板数据及投资引力模型的实证研究[J].国际贸易问题,2016(9):165-176.
[13] 左思明,朱明侠.“一带一路”沿线国家投资便利化测评与中国对外直接投资[J].财经理论与实践,2019(2):54-60.
[14] Melitz M J.The Impact of Trade on Intra-industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity[J].Econometrica, 2003(71):1695-1725.
[15] 小岛清. 对外贸易论[M].天津:南开大学出版社,1987.
[16] 彭羽,陈争辉.中国(上海)自由贸易试验区投资贸易便利化评价指标体系研究[J].国际经贸探索,2014(10):63-75.
[17] 崔日明,黄英婉.“一带一路”沿线国家贸易投资便利化评价指标体系研究[J].国际贸易问题,2016(9):153-164.
[18] 崔日明,黄英婉.“一带一路”沿线国家贸易投资便利化水平及其对中国出口的影响——基于面板数据的实证分析[J].广东社会科学,2017(3):5-13.
[19] 刘镇,邱志萍,朱丽萌.海上丝绸之路沿线国家投资贸易便利化时空特征及对贸易的影响[J].经济地理,2018(3):11-20.
[20] 喻胜华,聂早暖.贸易投资便利化对“一带一路”沿线国家双边贸易额的影响[J].湖南财政经济学院学报, 2018(6):35-44.
[21] 谭晶荣,蔡燕林,高颖,王瑞,李书彦.中国对丝绸之路经济带沿线国家农产品出口贸易决定因素分析[J].农业经济问题,2015(11):9-15+110.
[22] 孔庆峰,董虹蔚.“一带一路”国家的贸易便利化水平测算与贸易潜力研究[J].国际贸易问题,2015(12):158-168.
文章导航

/