ESG表现与企业权益融资成本
收稿日期: 2025-04-28
网络出版日期: 2026-01-06
基金资助
内蒙古自治区社会科学规划基金重点项目“内蒙古高耗能行业碳排放达峰路径研究”(2022NDA280)
ESG Performance and Corporate Equity Financing Costs
Received date: 2025-04-28
Online published: 2026-01-06
制造业企业长期面临“融资难、融资贵”的现实困境,这不仅限制了制造业产业规模的扩大,也阻碍了其向高端化、绿色化方向的转型升级。随着我国ESG信息披露制度的逐步完善,企业ESG表现对其权益融资成本的影响日益凸显。文章以2014—2023年沪深A股制造业上市公司为研究样本,实证检验ESG表现对企业权益融资成本的影响及其内在作用机制。研究结果表明:良好的ESG表现有助于降低企业权益融资成本,供应链集中度在其中发挥了部分中介作用;进一步分析发现,分析师关注度与融资约束分别在上述关系中发挥了正向调节作用与负向调节作用;同时,ESG表现降低企业权益融资成本的作用在营商环境水平较高的地区、数字化水平较高的企业及国有企业中更为显著。今后企业应将ESG理念深度融入治理架构与战略体系,通过降低经营风险与融资成本,有效增强可持续发展能力。
赵俊梅 , 胡晓娟 , 赵玉珍 . ESG表现与企业权益融资成本[J]. 新疆财经, 2025 , 0(6) : 57 -68 . DOI: 10.16716/j.cnki.65-1030/f.2025.06.010
Manufacturing enterprises have long been trapped in the chronic dilemma of “difficult and costly financing,” which not only limits the expansion of the manufacturing industry’s scale but also hinders its transformation and upgrading toward high-end and green development. With the gradual improvement of China’s ESG information disclosure system, the impact of corporate ESG performance on equity financing costs has become increasingly prominent. This paper uses A-share listed manufacturing companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2014 to 2023 as the research sample to empirically examine the impact of ESG performance on equity financing costs and its underlying mechanisms. The research results show that strong ESG performance helps reduce corporate equity financing costs, with supply chain concentration playing a partial mediating role in this relationship. Further analysis reveals that analyst attention and financing constraints positively and negatively moderate the above relationship, respectively. Additionally, the reducing effect of ESG performance on equity financing costs is more pronounced in regions with higher levels of business environment, enterprises with higher digitalization levels, and state-owned enterprises. In the future, enterprises should deeply integrate ESG principles into their governance structures and strategic systems, effectively enhancing their sustainable development capabilities by reducing operational risks and financing costs.
| [1] | 张雪, 张文松, 汪家源, 等. ESG表现对企业绿色技术创新的影响研究[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2025(2):101-111. |
| [2] | 姚正海, 王强. ESG表现对企业持续性创新的影响机制研究[J]. 软科学, 2025(6):99-108. |
| [3] | 王翌秋, 谢萌. ESG信息披露对企业融资成本的影响:基于中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 南开经济研究, 2022(11):75-94. |
| [4] | 崔志伟, 刘自敏, 田露露, 等. 企业ESG表现与融资约束:基于信息披露数量与质量的再讨论[J]. 产业经济评论, 2024(3):155-170. |
| [5] | 邱牧远, 殷红. 生态文明建设背景下企业ESG表现与融资成本[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019(3):108-123. |
| [6] | DEL GESSO C, LODHI R N. Theories underlying environmental,social and governance (ESG) disclosure:a systematic review of accounting studies[J]. Journal of accounting literature, 2025(2):433-461. |
| [7] | 张宏, 王宇婷, 林慧. 内外双“管”下ESG表现对企业融资成本的影响研究[J]. 产业经济评论, 2024(1):41-56. |
| [8] | GIDAGE M, BHIDE S. ESG and economic growth:catalysts for achieving sustainable development goals in developing economies[J]. Sustainable development, 2025(2):2060-2077. |
| [9] | 刘柏, 卢家锐. ESG榜单对企业融资成本冲击的异化效应[J]. 财经研究, 2024(4):124-138. |
| [10] | JIA X X, LI B, LIU Z X, et al. The green effects of fund market-analysis based on institutional investors’ preference[J]. Kybernetes, 2023(2):495-517. |
| [11] | ZHAO T J, WANG H Y. The industry peer effect of enterprise ESG performance:the moderating effect of customer concentration[J]. International review of economics & finance, 2024,92:1499-1525. |
| [12] | 阮磊, 杨丽雯. 供应商集中度对企业ESG表现的影响研究[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2025(3):14-24. |
| [13] | 李颖, 吴彦辰, 田祥宇. 企业ESG表现与供应链话语权[J]. 财经研究, 2023(8):153-168. |
| [14] | 林钟高, 韦文滔. ESG表现有助于降低客户集中度吗?[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(1):121-132. |
| [15] | 彭俞超, 王南萱, 邓贵川, 等. 数字经济时代的流量思维:基于供应链资金占用和金融获利的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2022(8):170-187. |
| [16] | 游家兴, 张哲远. 财务分析师公司治理角色研究:文献综述与研究展望[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016(5):128-136. |
| [17] | 李思飞, 温磊. 耐心资本对企业ESG表现的影响研究[J]. 经济问题, 2025(1):48-56. |
| [18] | PISCIOTTA K. Analyst workload and information production:evidence from IPO assignments[J]. Contemporary ac-counting research, 2023(3):1605-1640. |
| [19] | 白彦锋, 杨雨诗. 环境规制、研发投入与企业绿色创新[J]. 新疆财经, 2024(1):45-55. |
| [20] | 毛新述, 叶康涛, 张頔. 上市公司权益资本成本的测度与评价:基于我国证券市场的经验检验[J]. 会计研究, 2012(11):12-22. |
| [21] | 巫强, 姚雨秀. 企业数字化转型与供应链配置:集中化还是多元化[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(8):99-117. |
| [22] | 陈若鸿, 赵雪延, 金华. 企业ESG表现对其融资成本的影响[J]. 科学决策, 2022(11):24-40. |
| [23] | 赵良玉, 阮心怡, 刘芬芬. 社会责任信息披露对企业融资成本的影响:基于我国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2017(6):40-52. |
| [24] | 金绍荣, 漆祥洪, 熊若宇. ESG表现与农业企业韧性:影响效应及作用机制[J]. 改革, 2025(3):124-141. |
| [25] | 万光彩, 胡陈. 企业ESG履责与新质生产力的形成:基于外生异质性和路径机制的影响研究[J]. 管理学刊, 2025(4):29-47. |
| [26] | 李井林, 阳镇, 易俊玲. ESG表现有助于降低企业债务融资成本吗?:来自上市公司的微观证据[J]. 企业经济, 2023(2):89-99. |
| [27] | 温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014(5):731-745. |
| [28] | XU J, WU W, FENG X. The impact of ESG performances on analyst report readability:evidence from China[J]. Inter-national review of financial analysis, 2025,102:104056. |
| [29] | SANTOS A, CINCERA M. Determinants of financing constraints[J]. Small business economics, 2022(3):1427-1439. |
| [30] | 郭明杰, 王佳倩. 重污染企业ESG表现、媒体监督与融资成本关系研究[J]. 科学决策, 2023(11):1-20. |
| [31] | 周泽将, 雷玲. 营商环境优化与企业ESG表现[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(5):43-56. |
| [32] | 梁栋, 刘宇, 张硕. 数字化与绿色化协同转型的“创富共享”效应:来自中国A股上市公司的证据[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2025(6):65-80. |
| [33] | 李志军, 耿末, 耀友福. 企业数字化与ESG履责[J]. 会计研究, 2024(8):135-151. |
| [34] | 胡剑波, 叶树, 张宽元. 绿色金融政策与企业ESG表现:基于绿色金融改革创新试验区的准自然实验[J]. 金融论坛, 2024(7):59-69. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |