管理理论与实践

新疆“新三板”挂牌公司经营业绩评价与分析

  • 南晓芳 ,
  • 张倩
展开
  • 昌吉学院 经济管理系,新疆 昌吉 831100
南晓芳(1982-),女,讲师,研究方向:企业成长战略;张倩(1987-),女,讲师,研究方向:中小微企业融资与成长。

收稿日期: 2017-02-28

  网络出版日期: 2020-11-16

基金资助

新疆维吾尔自治区社会科学基金项目“促进新疆小微企业成长研究”(14BGL042);新疆维吾尔自治区高校人文社会科学重点研究基地——新疆大学创新管理研究中心招标课题“新疆民营企业成长战略研究”(XJEDU010113C03)

Performance Evaluation and Analysis of Companies in NEEQ in Xinjiang

  • Nan Xiaofang ,
  • Zhang Qian
Expand
  • Changji University, Changji 831100, China

Received date: 2017-02-28

  Online published: 2020-11-16

摘要

本文以新疆2014年至2016年挂牌全国中小企业股份转让系统(“新三板”)的90家公司为样本,以2015年数据为基础,运用熵权法构建了企业绩效评价体系,包括4个一级指标和17个二级指标,综合评价企业业绩。评价结果显示,影响企业业绩的首要指标是营运能力,其次是偿债能力;同时表明,新疆挂牌公司的营运能力指标得分最高,其次是偿债能力指标,得分最低的是成长能力指标。分行业比较,经营业绩平均得分最高的行业为农林牧渔业,最低的行业为信息传输、软件和信息技术服务业。盈利能力、偿债能力平均得分最高的行业均为建筑业;成长能力、营运能力平均得分最高的行业均为农林牧渔业。分企业性质比较,民营企业挂牌公司数量占绝对优势,其成长能力平均得分高于国有企业,但总体绩效得分低于国有企业。新疆“新三板”挂牌公司应充分认识自身的优势和不足,进一步提升其成长能力和偿债能力,尽早和尽可能多地实现挂牌效益。

本文引用格式

南晓芳 , 张倩 . 新疆“新三板”挂牌公司经营业绩评价与分析[J]. 新疆财经, 2017 , 0(3) : 29 -36 . DOI: 10.16716/j.cnki.65-1030/f.2017.03.004

Abstract

This paper, using 90 companies listed in National Equities Exchange and Quotations (NEEQ) from 2014 to 2016 in Xinjiang as samples with the data in 2015 as the basis, employs the entropy-weight method to construct the evaluation system, including 4 first-level indicators and 17 secondary indicators in order to carry out the comprehensive evaluation. The evaluation results show that the most important indicator is operating ability, followed by the debt paying ability. It also indicates that the highest score comes to operating capacity, next is debt paying ability, the growth ability scores lowest. Comparing from different industries, the highest average score of enterprise performance, growth ability and the operating capacity is the enterprises in agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and the companies that have lowest average score of performance are those providing service of information transmission, software and technology ones. Construction companies have a highest average score in the aspects of profit ability and debt paying ability. Furthermore, the number of private enterprises is absolutely large, the score of growth ability is higher than that of the state-owned enterprises, but the overall performance score is lower than that of the state-owned enterprises. Therefore, companies in Xinjiang which are listed in the NEEQ should fully realize their strengths and weaknesses, further promote their growth ability and debt paying ability to achieve benefits from the NEEQ as much as possible.

参考文献

[1]李慧云,张红璐.信息披露对新三板业绩波动的影响[J].中国国情国力,2015(12):23-25.
[2]林乐芬,唐峥.中小企业新三板市场融资现状与绩效分析——以“三省一市”694家中小企业为例[J].河北经贸大学学报,2015,36(6):71-76.
[3]薛超.新三板挂牌后制造业企业经营业绩变化情况分析[J].西部财会,2016(6):54-58.
[4]张思,等.新三板上市旅游企业绩效分析——以“来也股份”为例[J].经济发展研究,2017(1)下:202-204.
[5]纪汉霖,李光辉,邢浩.企业挂牌新三板财务绩效变动的实证研究[J].发展研究,2015(8):44-50.
[6]成学真,何林琳.新三板农业挂牌企业业绩评价[J].甘肃金融,2016(7):26-29.
[7]张冰秋.新三板企业绩效评价体系构建与实证[J].统计与决策,2016(24):186-188.
[8]金辉,金晓兰.基于PE/PB的我国新三板信息技术企业价值评估[J].商业研究,2016(2):96-101.
[9]徐晓飞,朱家稷.K-MEANS分析法在新三板上市公司企业业绩评价中的应用与研究[J].农村经济与科技,2016,27(17):156-158.
[10]闫庆友,陶杰.“新三板”挂牌企业绩效评价研究[J].财会月刊,2014(2)下:13-16.
[11]叶宗裕.关于多指标综合评价中指标正向化和无量纲化方法的选择[J].浙江统计,2003(4):24-25.
[12]张立军,等.线性综合评价模型中指标标准化方法的比较与选择[J].统计与信息论坛,2010,25(8):10-15.
[13]朱喜安,魏国栋.熵值法中无量纲化方法优良标准的探讨[J].统计与决策,2015(2):12-15.
[14]张勇,高敏.新三板挂牌企业发展比较研究[J].特区经济,2014(12):76-77.
[15]孙慧,许鹏,孙毅.新疆上市公司竞争力评价[J].创新管理研究,2014(12):180-187.
[16]张心岩.新疆上市公司绩效评价及实证分析[J].商业经济,2013(1):109-110.
[17]杨洪波,胡畔,陈映赫.基于组合赋权的上市公司财务绩效评价[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版),2012,14(5):464-468.
[18]朱晓.上市公司财务竞争力评价的实证研究——来自新疆上市公司的经验数据分析[J].中国管理信息化,2009,12(8):51-54.
[19]陈艳艳,张瑞龙.熵权法综合评价模型及Excel实现[J].中国科技信息,2007(23):192-193.
[20]张艳花.冷热新三板[J].中国金融,2016(1):96-99.
文章导航

/