The development of Xinjiang has always got heightened attention from the central government of china. The effect of paring assistance of 19 provinces and cities to Xinjiang is of great concern for the process of promoting the all-round development of people and social progress.This paper analyzes economic effects, problems and their causesof paring assistance policy since 2010. Firstly, by selecting the data from 15 prefectures and regions and analyzing the panel data with the new method called DID, itdraws the conclusion that the effects of the policy on Xinjiang's GDP growth is 3.1%, the return of investment to GDP is not significant,the regression coefficient of industrial structure represented by agriculture as the proportion of GDP is negative, which means we should reduce the proportion of primary industry and improve the industrial structure. But, the regression coefficient of population is only 0.1%, which means the growth of population does not significantly contribute to Xinjiang's economy. This problem is studied from the qualitative and quantitative perspective. Secondly, the existing problems and the related reasons during the pair assistance are analyzed comprehensively. At the end of this paper, it proposes some suggestions such as innovating the aid mode, mechanism and adjusting industrial structure.
Xiao Chunmei
,
Zhu Pingping
. The Comprehensive Economic Evaluation of Pairing Assistance Policy in Xinjiang and Related Suggestions[J]. Finance & Economics of Xinjiang, 2018
, 0(2)
: 5
-13
.
DOI: 10.16716/j.cnki.65-1030/f.2018.02.001
[1]陈瑞莲.欧盟国家的区域协调发展:经验与启示[J].政治学研究,2006(3):118-128.
[2]Steck Strasdas.Tourism in Technical Cooperation:A Guide to the Conception,Planning,and Implementation of Project——Accompanying Measures in Rural Development and Nature Conservation[Z].Eschborn,Germany:GTZ and BMZ,1999.
[3]Deloitte & Touche,IIED and ODI:Sustainable Tourism and Poverty Elimination Study:A Report for the Deportment of International Development[R].1999.
[4]Goodwin H.I..Tourism,Conservation,and Sustainable Development[Z].Institute for Environment and Development,1997.
[5]杜伟.西方国家对欠发达地区进行政府援助的经验与启示[J].发展研究,2000(12):34-36.
[6]杨明洪,孙继琼.中央财政补助对西藏经济发展和收入分配的影响分析[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2009(7):1-5.
[7]郑毅.法制背景下的对口援疆——以府际关系为视角[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2010(5):138-144.
[8]梁勇.高校对口援疆模式的探索与实践——构建可持续性“造血型”高校对口援疆新模式[J].中国高教研究,2009(2):61-62.
[9]刘迪生.援疆工作的实践与启示[J].经济研究参考,2012(31):77-83.
[10]季菲菲,陈江龙,袁丰,陈雯.府际关系视角下的跨区域经济合作——以江苏对口支援新疆伊犁哈萨克自治州州直地区为例[J].干旱区地理,2012(3):494-502.
[11]刘春宇.对口援疆政府应承担怎样的职责[J].中国经贸导刊,2011(18):44-45.
[12]王磊,黄云生.提高对口援藏有效性的途径研究——基于农牧民需求的视角[J].贵州民族研究,2014(8):163-166.
[13]李红杰,不能以“交钥匙”模式为荣[J].人民论坛,2010(18):40-41.
[14]杨明洪.对口援藏有效性的理论认识与实现路径研究[J].中国藏学,2014(3):126-132.
[15]刘瑞明,赵仁杰.西部大开发:增长驱动还是政策陷阱——基于PSM-DID方法的研究[J].中国工业经济,2015(6):32-43.
[16]杜炜,胡晶晶.中国缩小城乡差距政策效果评价体系及测度[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2016(4):134-141.
[17]迟国泰,陈洪海.基于固定效应变截距回归的区域规划政策效果评价研究[J].运筹与管理,2016(2):180-189.
[18]高志刚,刘伟,韩延玲.基于问卷调查的对口援疆经济效应分析与提升策略——以新疆阿勒泰地区为例[J].新疆社会科学,2015(4):125-131,164.
[19]刘迪生.依托内地省市援疆与提升自我发展能力面临的问题与对策建议[J].经济研究参考,2013(15):33-35.
