Finance & Economics of Xinjiang >
A Study of Impact of Government Guided Funds on Industrial Structure Upgrading
Received date: 2022-08-10
Online published: 2023-05-22
One of the important goals of government guided funds is to guide the upgrading of industrial structure. So, what is the impact of government guided funds on the upgrading of industrial structure? Based on the panel data of 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government from 2007 to 2017, this paper constructs a panel data model to empirically study the overall and regional effects of government guidance funds on industrial structure upgrading. The results indicate that according to the unit root and pulse response function, the overall effect of government guided funds on industrial structure upgrading is significant, and government guided funds can promote industrial structure upgrading. According to the variable coefficient fixed effect model, there are regional differences in the effect of government guided funds on industrial structure upgrading. Provincial government guided fund funds in Guizhou and other provinces have a positive effect on industrial structure upgrading, while provincial government guided funds in Beijing and other provinces have a negative effect on industrial structure upgrading, while provincial government guided funds in Shandong and other provinces have no significant effect on industrial structure upgrading. Accordingly, local governments should expand the scale of government guidance funds or establish a government guidance fund exit mechanism according to local conditions, strengthen the scientific management of government guidance funds, improve the performance appraisal mechanism of government guidance funds, and give full play to the role of government guidance funds in promoting the upgrading of industrial structure.
WANG Shujie , CAO Xiaoqian . A Study of Impact of Government Guided Funds on Industrial Structure Upgrading[J]. Finance & Economics of Xinjiang, 2023 , 0(2) : 39 -47 . DOI: 10.16716/j.cnki.65-1030/f.2023.02.004
| [1] | BRANDER J, DU Q Q, HELLMANN T. The Effects of Government-Sponsored Venture Capital:International Evidence[J]. Review of Finance, 2015(2):571-618. |
| [2] | CUMMING D, LI D. Public Policy,Entrepreneurship,and Venture Capital in the United State[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2013(C):345-367. |
| [3] | CUMMING D, GRILLI L, MURTINU S. Governmental and Independent Venture Capital Investments in Europe:A Firm-Level Performance Analysis[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2017(C):439-459. |
| [4] | ALPEROVYCH Y, HüBNER G, LOBET F. How does Governmental Versus Private Venture Capital Backing Affect a Firm's Efficiency?Evidence from Belgium[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2015(4):508-525. |
| [5] | 杨大楷, 李丹丹. 政府支持对中国风险投资业影响的实证研究[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2012(5):52-60. |
| [6] | 杨敏利, 李昕芳, 仵永恒. 政府创业投资引导基金的引导效应研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014(11):8-16. |
| [7] | 房燕, 鲍新中. 中国政府创业投资引导基金效用——基于随机效应模型的实证研究[J]. 技术经济, 2016(2):58-62+101. |
| [8] | 徐明. 政府引导基金是否发挥了引导作用——基于投资事件和微观企业匹配数据的检验[J]. 经济管理, 2021 (8):23-40. |
| [9] | 胡勇. 政府引导基金促进企业“融资造血”[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2022(6):106-110. |
| [10] | 陈丽娜, 段理. 政府引导基金地区差异对企业创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(1):69-76. |
| [11] | 汪艳莉, 黄远香. 区域创新发展与政府引导基金关系研究——基于DID模型分析[J]. 当代经济, 2022(2):66-71. |
| [12] | 刘志迎, 侯光宇, 莫鸿芳. 政府引导基金补贴阈限的影响因素研究——基于融资约束视角的分析[J]. 投资研究. 2021(9):15-26. |
| [13] | 冯冰, 杨敏利, 王凤. 阶段投资对风险投资机构投资绩效的影响:投资区域的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2016(2):124-131. |
| [14] | 曾国平, 王燕飞. 中国金融发展与产业结构变迁[J]. 财贸经济, 2007(8):18-20. |
| [15] | 付宏, 毛蕴诗, 宋来胜. 创新对产业结构高级化影响的实证研究——基于2000—2011年省际面板数据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013(9):56-68. |
| [16] | 贾敬全, 殷李松. 财政支出对产业结构升级的空间效应研究[J]. 财经研究, 2015(9):18-28. |
| [17] | 韩永辉, 黄亮雄, 王贤彬. 产业结构优化升级改进生态效率了吗?[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2016(4):40-59. |
| [18] | 陈志强, 田美娟, 张红梅. 政府创业投资引导基金能促进区域创新能力的提高吗?——基于省际面板数据的实证研究[J]. 时代金融, 2017(24):218-219. |
| [19] | 冯芳芳, 蒲勇健. 我国区域产业结构优化及其影响因素分析——基于分位数回归方法[J]. 技术经济, 2012(2):36-42. |
| [20] | 罗荣华, 门明, 何珺子. 金融发展在促进我国产业结构调整中的效果研究——基于我国30个省级面板数据[J]. 经济问题探索, 2014(8):84-91. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |