Finance & Economics of Xinjiang >
Assessment of Green Innovation Effect on Coordinated Development of Urban Agglomerations in China—Based on the Perspective of the Urban Economic Coordination Association
Received date: 2022-11-20
Online published: 2023-09-20
The report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China has pointed out that high-quality development is the primary task of comprehensively building a modern socialist country. Regional green innovation is the essence of high quality development, but there is still a lack of systematic and in-depth research on whether the collaborative development of urban agglomerations can bring about the green innovation effect. Therefore, based on the perspective of the urban agglomeration economic coordination committee, this paper evaluates the impact of coordinated development policy of urban agglomeration on green innovation by the green patent data and the PSM-DID method, and tests the robustness by using different matching strategies and eliminating the interference of urban scale. Results are as follows. The collaborative development of urban agglomerations significantly promotes regional green innovation, and the promotion of invention green patents is stronger than that of utility model green patents. The coordinated development of urban agglomerations shows significant incentive effect on the green innovation of both newly joined cities and existing joined cities. The incentive effect on the green innovation of existing joined cities is more obvious than newly joined cities. The intermediary effect test shows that the coordinated development of urban agglomerations can stimulate the green innovation by strengthening environmental regulation, weakening decentralization competition, promoting industrial upgrading and strengthening information density. The coordinated development of urban agglomerations influences the green innovation of newly joined cities more by promoting industrial upgrading and weakening the decentralized competition, and influences the green innovation of existing joined cities by enhancing environmental regulation and information density.In the future, we should further improve the system and mechanism for coordinated development of green innovation, adopt differentiated policies, strengthen the construction of supporting social public service systems and cultural atmosphere environment, and promote the ecological and green integrated development of urban agglomerations in China.
CHEN Xiuying . Assessment of Green Innovation Effect on Coordinated Development of Urban Agglomerations in China—Based on the Perspective of the Urban Economic Coordination Association[J]. Finance & Economics of Xinjiang, 2023 , 0(5) : 5 -15 . DOI: 10.16716/j.cnki.65-1030/f.2023.05.001
| [1] | 齐绍洲, 林屾, 崔静波. 环境权益交易市场能否诱发绿色创新?:基于我国上市公司绿色专利数据的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2018(12):129-143. |
| [2] | 周力, 沈坤荣. 国家级城市群建设对绿色创新的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020(8):92-99. |
| [3] | 王珍愚, 曹瑜, 林善浪. 环境规制对企业绿色技术创新的影响特征与异质性:基于中国上市公司绿色专利数据[J]. 科学学研究, 2021(5):909-919+929. |
| [4] | 王娟茹, 张渝. 环境规制、绿色技术创新意愿与绿色技术创新行为[J]. 科学学研究, 2018(2):352-360. |
| [5] | 游达明, 欧阳乐茜. 环境规制对工业企业绿色创新效率的影响:基于空间杜宾模型的实证分析[J]. 改革, 2020 (5):122-138. |
| [6] | 王博, 张永忠, 陈灵杉, 等. 中国城市绿色创新水平及影响因素贡献度分解[J]. 科研管理, 2020(8):123-134. |
| [7] | 吴传清, 黄磊. 演进轨迹、绩效评估与长江中游城市群的绿色发展[J]. 改革, 2017(3):65-77. |
| [8] | 李璟, 陈胜蓝. “城市经济协调会”对上市公司创新的影响:来自准自然实验的证据[J]. 南开经济研究, 2021(1): 102-121. |
| [9] | 姜宁, 奚晨弗, 董成. 区域合作、竞争对创新绩效的促进作用分析:基于高技术产业的实证研究[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2012(5):64-71. |
| [10] | 金刚, 沈坤荣. 以邻为壑还是以邻为伴?:环境规制执行互动与城市生产率增长[J]. 管理世界, 2018(12):43-55. |
| [11] | LIU Y, LIU S, SHAO X, et al. Policy spillover effect and action mechanism for environmental rights trading on green innovation:evidence from China’s carbon emissions trading policy[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2022(153):1-19. |
| [12] | 胡志高, 李光勤, 曹建华. 环境规制视角下的区域大气污染联合治理:分区方案设计、协同状态评价及影响因素分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(5):24-42. |
| [13] | 陈蓓, 彭文斌, 刘奕飞. 长江中游城市群绿色创新效率的时空演变与驱动因素[J]. 经济地理, 2022(9):43-49. |
| [14] | IRFAN M, RAZZAQ A, SHARIF A, et al. Influence mechanism between green finance and green innovation:explor- ing regional policy intervention effects in China[J]. Technological forecasting & social change, 2022(182):121882. |
| [15] | 宋冬林, 姚常成. 高铁运营与经济协调会合作机制是否打破了城市群市场分割:来自长三角城市群的经验证据[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2019(2):4-14. |
| [16] | 张学良, 李培鑫, 李丽霞. 政府合作、市场整合与城市群经济绩效:基于长三角城市经济协调会的实证检验[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2017(4):1563-1582. |
| [17] | 李青原, 肖泽华. 异质性环境规制工具与企业绿色创新激励:来自上市企业绿色专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2020(9):192-208. |
| [18] | DENG Y, YOU D, WANG J. Optimal strategy for enterprises’ green technology innovation from the perspective of political competition[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2019(235):930-942. |
| [19] | 金露露, 王子晨. 区域一体化对城市绿色创新水平的影响研究:基于长三角26个城市的动态空间面板实证检验[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2019(11):111-116. |
| [20] | LIU Y, SHAO X, TANG M, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution of green innovation network and its multidimensional proximity analysis:empirical evidence from China[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2021(283):124649. |
| [21] | 尤济红, 陈喜强. 区域一体化合作是否导致污染转移:来自长三角城市群扩容的证据[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019(6):118-129. |
| [22] | 陈浩, 冯艳, 魏文栋. 环境污染信息公开是否提升了城市技术创新?[J]. 环境经济研究, 2020(3):56-75. |
| [23] | 张学良, 林永然, 孟美侠. 长三角区域一体化发展机制演进:经验总结与发展趋向[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(1):138-147. |
| [24] | 刘乃全, 吴友. 长三角扩容能促进区域经济共同增长吗[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017(6):79-97. |
| [25] | 刘胜. 多中心城市空间结构与FDI行业间外溢[J]. 云南财经大学学报, 2018(7):47-56. |
| [26] | 陈秀英, 刘胜. 多中心空间演化促进了制造业全球价值链分工地位攀升吗?[J]. 云南财经大学学报, 2020(3): 79-91. |
| [27] | 金培振, 殷德生, 金桩. 城市异质性、制度供给与创新质量[J]. 世界经济, 2019(11):99-123. |
| [28] | 温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报, 2004(5):614-620. |
| [29] | SHI X, XU Z. Environmental regulation and firm exports:evidence from the eleventh Five-Year Plan in China[J]. Journal of environmental economics and management, 2018(89):187-200. |
| [30] | 于斌斌. 产业结构调整与生产率提升的经济增长效应:基于中国城市动态空间面板模型的分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015(12):83-98. |
| [31] | 张志彬. 公众参与、监管信息公开与城市环境治理:基于35个重点城市的面板数据分析[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2021(1):109-116. |
| [32] | 邓晓兰, 刘若鸿, 许晏君. 经济分权、地方政府竞争与城市全要素生产率[J]. 财政研究, 2019(4):23-41. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |