The Influence of Legal Environment on the High-Quality Development of Enterprises

  • LIN Yongjian ,
  • ZHENG Rongcan
Expand
  • Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China

Received date: 2025-07-06

  Online published: 2026-09-07

Abstract

This paper selects relevant data of A-share listed companies in China from 2009 to 2022 to empirically analyze the impact of the legal environment on the high-quality development of enterprises. The results show that the improvement of the legal environment can promote the high-quality development of enterprises. Further mechanism analysis shows that the improvement of legal environment can significantly promote the high-quality development of enterprises through reducing corporate debt financing costs, increasing enterprise innovation investment, and improving corporate information transparency. In addition, compared with enterprises in non-heavily polluting industries, CEO duality firms, small and medium-sized enterprises and high-tech enterprises, the positive effect of legal environment improvement on high-quality enterprise development is more significant in heavy-polluting enterprises, non-CEO duality firms, large-scale enterprises and non-high-tech enterprises. In the future, enterprises need to further enhance their awareness of the rule of law, optimize their debt structure, increase investment in innovation, and improve their information disclosure mechanisms. The government should continue to strengthen the construction of the rule of law, enhance market supervision, increase the transparency of law enforcement, and optimize government services. By working together, the government and enterprises can create a better legal environment to promote the high-quality development of enterprises.

Cite this article

LIN Yongjian , ZHENG Rongcan . The Influence of Legal Environment on the High-Quality Development of Enterprises[J]. Finance & Economics of Xinjiang, 2026 , 0(2) : 5 -17 . DOI: 10.16716/j.cnki.65-1030/f.2026.02.001

References

[1] 蔡跃洲, 马文君. 数据要素对高质量发展影响与数据流动制约[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2021(3):64-83.
[2] PORTA R L, LOPEZ‐DE‐SILANES F, SHLEIFER A, et al. Investor protection and corporate valuation[J]. The journal of finance, 2002(3):1147-1170.
[3] 代昀昊, 童心楚, 王砾, 等. 法治强化能够促进企业绿色创新吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2023(2):115-133.
[4] 段姝, 刘霞, 殷蓉, 等. 减税降费赋能企业高质量发展了吗?[J]. 经济问题, 2022(1):20-30.
[5] 许志勇, 宋泽. 研发投资、政策激励与企业高质量发展[J]. 管理评论, 2023(9):127-141.
[6] 许和连, 王海成. 简政放权改革会改善企业出口绩效吗?:基于出口退(免)税审批权下放的准自然试验[J]. 经济研究, 2018(3):157-170.
[7] 吴浩强, 胡苏敏. 数字化转型、技术创新与企业高质量发展[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2023(1):136-145.
[8] CAMPBELL J L. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways?an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility[J]. The academy of management review, 2007(3):946-967.
[9] 谢德仁, 张高菊. 金融生态环境、负债的治理效应与债务重组:经验证据[J]. 会计研究, 2007(12):43-50.
[10] 王喜, 武玲玲, 邓晓兰. 环境信息披露、媒体关注与债务融资成本:基于重污染行业上市公司的分析[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(2):67-78.
[11] 杜善重, 马连福. 数字化转型速度如何影响企业债务融资:基于“降成本”与“去杠杆”视角的研究[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2024(2):52-62.
[12] 高慧清, 翟亚新. 金融开放对企业全要素生产率的影响[J]. 西部论坛, 2025(1):36-50.
[13] 陈昭, 刘映曼. 政府补贴、企业创新与制造业企业高质量发展[J]. 改革, 2019(8):140-151.
[14] ACEMOGLU D, AKCIGIT U. Intellectual property rights policy,competition and innovation[J]. Journal of the Eu-ropean economic association, 2012(1):1-42.
[15] 夏后学, 谭清美, 白俊红. 营商环境、企业寻租与市场创新:来自中国企业营商环境调查的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2019(4):84-98.
[16] 任晓猛, 钱滔, 潘士远, 等. 新时代推进民营经济高质量发展:问题、思路与举措[J]. 管理世界, 2022(8):40-54.
[17] 王兰芳, 王悦, 侯青川. 法制环境、研发“粉饰”行为与绩效[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019(2):128-141.
[18] BUSOM I. An empirical evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies[J]. Economics of innovation and new technology, 2000(2):111-148.
[19] 李春涛, 王悦, 张璇. 激进避税行为与股价暴跌风险:外部监管视角与因果识别策略[J]. 财贸经济, 2021(6):37-53.
[20] 江婕, 王正位, 龚新宇. 信息透明度与股价崩盘风险的多维实证研究[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2021(2):53-65.
[21] 金桂荣. 区域因素影响下我国上市公司资本结构动态调整研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2016(7):125-133.
[22] 黄勃, 李海彤, 刘俊岐, 等. 数字技术创新与中国企业高质量发展:来自企业数字专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023(3):97-115.
[23] 祝继高, 朱佳信, 李天时, 等. 政府会计监督与银行信贷行为研究:基于财政部会计信息质量随机检查的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2023(1):157-176.
[24] 俞红海, 徐龙炳, 陈百助. 终极控股股东控制权与自由现金流过度投资[J]. 经济研究, 2010(8):103-114.
[25] BENNETT B, STULZ R, WANG Z X. Does the stock market make firms more productive?[J]. Journal of financial economics, 2020(2):281-306.
[26] 李甜甜, 李金甜. 绿色治理如何赋能高质量发展:基于ESG履责和全要素生产率关系的解释[J]. 会计研究, 2023(6):78-98.
[27] 罗进辉, 刘玥, 杨帆. 高管团队稳定性与公司债务融资成本[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023(5):95-106.
[28] 张建顺, 匡浩宇. 地方债治理促进了企业创新吗?:来自上市公司的经验证据[J]. 国际金融研究, 2021(6):86-96.
[29] 李英利, 谭梦卓. 会计信息透明度与企业价值:基于生命周期理论的再检验[J]. 会计研究, 2019(10):27-33.
[30] 潘爱玲, 刘昕, 邱金龙, 等. 媒体压力下的绿色并购能否促使重污染企业实现实质性转型[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(2):174-192.
[31] 闫永生, 李凌飞, 刘慧侠. 资本市场开放与企业高质量发展:基于经济效率和可持续发展视角的检验[J]. 南京审计大学学报, 2023(5):81-90.
[32] 白洁. 对外直接投资特征对高科技企业生产率的异质性影响[J]. 科研管理, 2022(7):200-208.
Outlines

/

〈 〉