Finance & Economics of Xinjiang >
A Study of Blockchain-Empowered International Investment Risk Prevention under the Belt and Road Initiative Framework
Received date: 2025-05-26
Online published: 2026-09-07
Based on the current challenges of intensified international investment risks and the lagging traditional relief mechanisms under the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative, this paper explores the effective path of reconstructing the international investment risk prevention and control mechanism by applying blockchain technology. The distributed ledger, smart contracts, and information security and transparency features of blockchain can help to reconstruct the international investment risk prevention and control mechanism: by building a trusted data platform to bridge the information gap and achieve precise risk early warning; by using smart contracts to automatically execute contract terms and reduce the risk of performance from the source; and by applying on-chain arbitration to solidify evidence and accommodate multi-jurisdictional rules, thereby enhancing the efficiency and fairness of relief. Drawing on successful domestic cases, under the premise of respecting national sovereignty, a multi-jurisdictional alliance arbitration chain can be established, with the deployment of full-cycle on-chain evidence preservation and automated risk control contracts, to construct a "sovereignty-technology" balanced legal supervision framework, providing a digital solution for international investment risk prevention and control under the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative.
WU Xiaoyan , HUANG Zurui . A Study of Blockchain-Empowered International Investment Risk Prevention under the Belt and Road Initiative Framework[J]. Finance & Economics of Xinjiang, 2026 , 0(2) : 72 -80 . DOI: 10.16716/j.cnki.65-1030/f.2026.02.007
| [1] | 黄丽娟, 郭进. “一带一路”战略面临的政治风险与中国的战略选择[J]. 青海社会科学, 2017(1):28-34. |
| [2] | 梁咏. 国际投资仲裁机制变革与中国对策研究[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018(3):160-172. |
| [3] | 杨瑞龙, 聂辉华. 不完全契约理论:一个综述[J]. 经济研究, 2006(2):104-115. |
| [4] | 李国学. 不完全契约、国家权力与对外直接投资保护[J]. 世界经济与政治, 2018(7):122-141. |
| [5] | 于飞, 柯月婷. 论国际投资仲裁“正当性危机”的应对:以司法谦抑为进路[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(5):57-66. |
| [6] | 袁勇, 王飞跃. 区块链技术发展现状与展望[J]. 自动化学报, 2016(4):481-494. |
| [7] | 刘敖迪, 杜学绘, 王娜, 等. 区块链技术及其在信息安全领域的研究进展[J]. 软件学报, 2018(7):2092-2115. |
| [8] | 涂红, 刘程. 区块链在全球贸易与金融领域中的应用[J]. 国际贸易, 2018(10):63-67. |
| [9] | 托马斯·福特·布朗, 木子西. 社会资本理论综述[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 2000(2):41-46. |
| [10] | 袁庆明, 刘洋. 威廉姆森交易成本决定因素理论评析[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2004(5):16-20. |
| [11] | 贺海武, 延安, 陈泽华. 基于区块链的智能合约技术与应用综述[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 2018(11):2452-2466. |
| [12] | 尉明洋, 李曦. 区块链视域下国际投资仲裁的现实挑战与法律因应[J]. 商事仲裁与调解, 2024(4):72-84. |
| [13] | SCHMITZ A J, RULE C. Online dispute resolution for smart contracts[J]. Journal of dispute resolution, 2019(2): 103-125. |
| [14] | 韦夏怡. “区块链+存证”首份裁决书诞生 FISCO BCOS深化场景布局[N]. 经济参考报,2018-03-16(A08). |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |