Research on Spatial-temporal Features of Xinjiang New-type Urbanization Development

  • Xin Chongchong ,
  • Jing Shouwu ,
  • Chen Zhiguo
Expand
  • 1. Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073, China;
    2. Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China;
    3. Xian Yang Normal University, Xian Yang 712000, China

Received date: 2017-05-11

  Online published: 2020-11-26

Abstract

On the basis of understanding the connotation of the new-type urbanization, an evaluation system of new-type urbanization was established in the paper, which was composed of four subsystems including economic urbanization, space urbanization, social urbanization and resources and environment urbanization. The coupling coordination degree evaluation model was adopted to measure the new-type urbanization coordinated development level in Xinjiang. Moreover, a quantitative evaluation was conducted on the urbanization level and the four subsystems of coordinated development of 15 regions and prefectures in Xinjiang from the spatial-temporal variation characteristics. The results showed that from the point of time-series, the urbanization development indexes of economy, space, social and resources & environment respectively showed obvious rising trend from the 2002 to 2015, but impact of the historical conditions and internal and external factors in different period made the dominant driving forces of urbanization present a clear stage characteristic. Meanwhile, the coupling coordination degree was on the rise during this period, namely from 0.0844 in 2002 to 0.4701 in 2015. However, the type of coupling coordination was still in the phase of mild disorder until 2015.There was a certain distance away from the general coordination phase, and a big gap from high coordination and extreme coordination. From the spatial distribution of it in 2015, the new urbanization development level and the coordination development level of economy, space, social and resources & environment had significant characteristics with the low level of overall development, obvious regional differentiation and so on.

Cite this article

Xin Chongchong , Jing Shouwu , Chen Zhiguo . Research on Spatial-temporal Features of Xinjiang New-type Urbanization Development[J]. Finance & Economics of Xinjiang, 2017 , 0(4) : 47 -58 . DOI: 10.16716/j.cnki.65-1030/f.2017.04.006

References

[1]单卓然,黄亚平.“新型城镇化”概念内涵、目标内容、规划策略及认知误区解析[J].城市规划学刊,2013,20(2):16-22.
[2]杜辉.新型城市化中质量递升战略 [J].改革与开放,2002,11(2):28-29.
[3]王新越,秦素贞,吴宁宁.新型城镇化的内涵、测度及其区域差异研究 [J].地域研究与开发,2014,33(4):69-75.
[4]张许颖,黄匡时.以人为核心的新型城镇化的基本内涵、主要指标和政策框架[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(11):280-283.
[5]姚士谋,等.中国新型城镇化理论与实践问题[J].地理科学,2014,34(6):641-647.
[6]郭叶波.城镇化质量的内涵及其评价指标体系[J].学习与实践,2013,20(3):13-20.
[7]吕丹,叶萌,杨琼.新型城镇化质量评价指标体系综述与重构[J].财经问题研究,2014,36(9):72-78.
[8]沈宏超,洪功翔.新型城镇化质量测度指标体系及实证研究[J].农业现代化研究,2015,36(3):413-418.
[9]梁振民,陈才,刘继生,梅林.东北地区城市化发展质量的综合测度与层级特征研究[J].地理科学,2013,33(8):926-933.
[10]贾琦,运迎霞.京津冀都市圈城镇化质量测度及区域差异分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(3):8-12.
[11]杨璐璐.中部六省城镇化质量空间格局演变及驱动因素—基于地级及以上城市的分析[J].经济地理,2015,35(1):68-75.
[12]程莉,周宗社.人口城镇化与经济城镇化的协调与互动关系研究[J].理论月刊,2014,30(1):119-122.
[13]崔许锋.民族地区的人口城镇化与土地城镇化:非均衡性与空间差异性[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(8):63-72.
[14]李涛,廖和平,杨伟,庄伟,时仅.重庆市“土地、人口、产业”城镇化质量的时空分异及耦合协调性[J].经济地理,2015,35(5):65-71.
[15]安晓亮,安瓦尔·买买提明.新疆新型城镇化水平综合评价研究[J].城市规划,2013,37(7):23-27.
[16]闵海龙,胡青江.新疆新型城镇化发展指标体系构建和评价分析[J].改革与战略,2014(2):100-104.
[17]王毅,丁正山,余茂军,等.基于耦合模型的现代服务业与城镇化协调关系的量化分析—以江苏省常熟市为例[J].地理研究, 2015,34(1):97-108.
[18]李秋颖,方创琳,王少剑,等.山东省人口城镇化与空间城镇化协调发展及空间格局[J].地域研究与开发,2015,34(1):31-36.
[19]张卫民,安景文,韩朝.熵值法在城市可持续发展评价问题中的应用[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2003,20(7):115-118.
[20]陶晓燕,章仁俊,徐辉,等.基于改进熵值法的城市可持续发展能力的评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(5):38-41.
[21]李明秋,郎学彬.城镇化质量的内涵及其评价指标体系的构建[J].中国软科学,2010,25(12):182-186.
Outlines

/