The Impact of Multi-Dimensional Institutional Differences on China's OFDI—Based on the Data of 34 Countries Along "the Belt and Road"

  • HU Ying ,
  • GAO Yali
Expand
  • Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, China

Received date: 2021-12-27

  Online published: 2022-09-05

Abstract

China's economic development has entered the stage of capital export from commodity export. However, in the process of continuous export of China's OFDI, the institutional environment of the host country has gradually become one of the important factors affecting China's OFDI, and the institutional difference between China and the host country will also have an important impact on China's capital export. Based on sample data of China's OFDI to 34 countries along the Belt and Road from 2006 to 2019, the investment gravity model is constructed and the fixed effect regression method is used to empirically analyze the impact of economic, political and legal institutional differences on China's direct investment in countries along the Belt and Road. The results show that the legal institutional difference has the greatest negative effect on China's direct investment in the countries along the Belt and Road, the negative influence of political and economic system difference decreased successively. China's direct investment in different types of countries along the Belt and Road is also significantly heterogeneous due to institutional differences. For countries along the Belt and Road with different economic systems and levels of economic development, differences in legal institution have the greatest impact on China's OFDI. Moreover, the restraining effect on China's direct investment in transition countries and high-income countries along the Belt and Road is significantly greater than that on non-transition countries and low and middle income countries. From the perspective of countries with different levels of resource abundance, legal institutional difference has no significant impact on China's direct investment in resource-rich countries along the Belt and Road. However, it has a significant negative impact on the direct investment of resource-deficient countries along the Belt and Road.

Cite this article

HU Ying , GAO Yali . The Impact of Multi-Dimensional Institutional Differences on China's OFDI—Based on the Data of 34 Countries Along "the Belt and Road"[J]. Finance & Economics of Xinjiang, 2022 , 0(4) : 57 -68 . DOI: 10.16716/j.cnki.65-1030/f.2022.04.006

References

[1] 袁涌波. 从商品输出到资本输出——浙江开放型经济转型研究[J]. 中共浙江省委党校学报, 2011(1):28-33.
[2] Simeon D, Caroline F. New Borders:Evidence from the Former Soviet Union[J]. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 2002(3):493-508.
[3] Jesus S H. Corruption Distance and Foreign Direct Investment[J]. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 2016(2):400-419.
[4] 赵云辉, 赵传莉, 陶克涛. 制度差异、二元经验与中国对外直接投资——基于50个“一带一路”国家和20个发达国家的经验证据[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2020(12):64-78.
[5] Mudambi R, Navarra P. Institutions and Internation Business:A Theoretical Overview[J]. International Business Review, 2002(6):635-646.
[6] 郭苏文, 黄汉民. 制度距离对我国外向FDI的影响——基于动态面板模型的实证研究[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2010(11):21-26.
[7] 李强. 制度距离对我国企业跨国并购绩效的影响研究——基于上市公司数据的实证分析[J]. 软科学, 2015(10):65-68+82.
[8] 蒋冠宏, 蒋殿春. 中国对发展中国家的投资——东道国制度重要吗?[J]. 管理世界, 2012(11):45-56.
[9] 冀相豹. 中国对外直接投资影响因素分析——基于制度的视角[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2014(9):98-108.
[10] 刘双芹, 李敏燕. 制度距离对中国OFDI区位选择的影响[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018(2):58-64+91.
[11] 沈坤荣, 金刚. 制度差异、“一带一路”倡议与中国大型对外投资——基于投资边际、模式与成败的三重视角[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2018(8):20-33.
[12] 刘振林, 黄凯. 制度距离对中国对外直接投资区位分布的影响研究——基于“一带一路”沿线47国数据的实证分析[J]. 经济经纬, 2019(2):64-71.
[13] 郭毅. 制度差异对中国对外直接投资影响——基于“一带一路”国家和发达国家的差异性分析[J]. 内蒙古财经大学学报, 2021(1):95-97.
[14] Anderson J E. A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation[J]. American Economic Review, 1979(1):106-116.
[15] 方齐云, 肖双薇. 多维距离对中国在“一带一路”直接投资的影响——基于引力模型与面板门槛的实证分析[J]. 武汉金融, 2019(9):20-27.
[16] 蒋冠宏, 蒋殿春. 中国对外投资的区位选择:基于投资引力模型的面板数据检验[J]. 世界经济, 2012(9):21-40.
[17] 邹嘉龄, 刘春腊, 尹国庆, 唐志鹏. 中国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易格局及其经济贡献[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015(5):598-605.
[18] Kogut B, Singh H. The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1988(3):411-432.
[19] 王恕立, 向姣姣. 制度质量、投资动机与中国对外直接投资的区位选择[J]. 财经研究, 2015(5):134-144.
[20] 潘海英, 贾婷婷, 张可. 中国对“一带一路”沿线国家直接投资:经济发展、资源禀赋和制度环境[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(2):35-46+106.
[21] 许家云, 周绍杰, 胡鞍钢. 制度距离、相邻效应与双边贸易——基于“一带一路”国家空间面板模型的实证分析[J]. 财经研究, 2017(1):75-85.
[22] 吕开剑, 孙慧. “一带一路”背景下制度距离对中国对外直接投资企业经营绩效的影响研究——基于门槛回归方法[J]. 新疆农垦经济, 2019(10):44-54.
[23] 邵宇佳, 刘文革, 陈红. 制度距离、投资动机与企业OFDI区位选择——中国对外直接投资“制度风险偏好”的一种解释[J]. 西部论坛, 2020(2):95-108.
Outlines

/