Can Environmental Regulation Break "Resource Curse"?—Theoretical Mechanism and Empirical Evidence

  • YANG Tianyu ,
  • QIU Shiyan
Expand
  • Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Received date: 2022-03-14

  Online published: 2023-05-26

Abstract

Based on the panel data of 115 resource-based prefecture-level cities in China from 2007 to 2019, this paper explores the mechanism of environmental regulation stimulating technological innovation and breaking the "resource curse" by integrating natural resource dependence, environmental regulation and technological innovation into the same analytical framework and establishing the endogenous growth model of four sectors. The results show that the relationship between environmental regulation and natural resource dependence and technological innovation has a significant nonlinear moderating effect, that is, environmental regulation can promote the technological innovation of resource-based cities as a forcing mechanism; Different types of resource-based cities have different threshold values of environmental regulations, which need to implement different intensity of environmental regulations. High-intensity environmental regulation can completely break the "resource curse" in the growing resource-based cities, but can weaken the "resource curse" in the mature and declining resource-based cities. Therefore, differentiated environmental regulation measures should be implemented for different types of resource-based cities, and the synergy of environmental regulation and other policies and measures should be brought into play to promote the transformation and upgrading of industrial structure and gradually get rid of resource dependence.

Cite this article

YANG Tianyu , QIU Shiyan . Can Environmental Regulation Break "Resource Curse"?—Theoretical Mechanism and Empirical Evidence[J]. Finance & Economics of Xinjiang, 2022 , 0(3) : 5 -15 . DOI: 10.16716/j.cnki.65-1030/f.2022.03.001

References

[1] Sachs J D, Warner A M. The Big Push,Natural Resource Booms and Growth[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 1999(1):43-76.
[2] Kim D H, Lin S C. Human Capital and Natural Resource Dependence[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2017(1):92-102.
[3] 邵帅, 齐中英. 资源输出型地区的技术创新与经济增长——对“资源诅咒”现象的解释[J]. 管理科学学报, 2009(6):23-33.
[4] Gray W B, Shadbegian R J. Plant Vintage,Technology and Environmental Regulation[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 2003(3):384-402.
[5] 王国印, 王动. 波特假说、环境规制与企业技术创新——对中东部地区的比较分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2011(1): 100-112.
[6] Porter M E, Linde C. Toward a New Conception of the Environment Competitiveness Relationship[J]. Journal of Eco- nomic Perspectives, 1995(4):97-118.
[7] 涂正革, 谌仁俊. 排污权交易在中国能否实现波特效应?[J]. 经济研究, 2015(7):160-173.
[8] 杜龙政, 赵云辉, 陶克涛, 林伟芬. 环境规制、治理转型对绿色竞争力提升的复合效应——基于中国工业的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2019(10):106-120.
[9] Sachs J D, Warner A M. The Curse of Natural Resources[J]. European Economic Review, 2001(4):827-838.
[10] Cockx L, Francken N. Natural Resources:A Curse on Education Spending?[J]. Energy Policy, 2016(2):394-408.
[11] Lawer E T, Lukas M C, Jogensen S H. The Neglected Role of Local Institutions in the "Resource Curse" Debate. Limestone Mining in the Krobo Region of Ghana[J]. Resources Policy, 2017(8):43-52.
[12] 李江龙, 徐斌. “诅咒”还是“福音”:资源丰裕程度如何影响中国绿色经济增长?[J]. 经济研究, 2018(9):151-167.
[13] Aghion P, Howitt P. Endogenous Growth Theory[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press,1998.
[14] Lucas R E. On the Mechanics of Economic Development[J]. Joournal of Monetary Economics, 1988(22):3-42.
[15] Romer P M. Endogenous Technological Change[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990(98):71-102.
[16] Schumpeter J, Barkhaus U. The Theory of Economic Development[M]. London:Macmillan,1968.
[17] 余明桂, 范蕊, 钟慧洁. 中国产业政策与企业技术创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2016(12):5-22.
[18] 范承泽, 胡一帆, 郑红亮. FDI对国内企业技术创新影响的理论与实证研究[J]. 经济研究, 2008(1):89-102.
Outlines

/