制度差异对我国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易关系的影响——基于随机前沿引力模型分析

doi:10.16716/j.cnki.65-1030/f.2021.03.007

新疆财经 ›› 2021,Issue (3): 71-80.doi: 10.16716/j.cnki.65-1030/f.2021.03.007

• 丝路研究 • 上一篇

制度差异对我国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易关系的影响——基于随机前沿引力模型分析

牛君, 卢宇泽

甘肃政法大学经济学院,甘肃兰州 730070

收稿日期:2020-07-26 出版日期:2021-06-25 发布日期:2021-06-30
作者简介:牛君（1971—）,男,教授,经济学博士,研究方向为区域经济、国际经济;卢宇泽（1997—）,男,硕士研究生,研究方向为区域经济及可持续发展。
基金资助:
甘肃政法大学校级重点课题“‘一带一路’背景下西北地区对外贸易发展研究”（GZF2019XZDLW16）

The Influence of Institutional Differences on the Foreign Trade Relations between China and the Countries along the Belt and Road —Based on Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model

Niu Jun, Lu Yuze

Gansu University of Political Science and Law,Lanzhou 730070,China

Received:2020-07-26 Online:2021-06-25 Published:2021-06-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文选取2000年—2018年“一带一路”沿线56个国家的贸易数据,利用拓展的随机前沿引力模型从进出口贸易两个层面就制度差异对我国与“一带一路”沿线国家对外贸易关系的影响进行分析,结果显示制度差异总指标与我国进出口贸易均呈倒U形关系,说明在合理化范围内制度差异对出口贸易具有促进作用,超过合理化水平则会抑制出口贸易增长,同时抑制进口贸易市场的扩大。此外,通过构建制度差异分项指标模型,并与制度差异总指标进行对比得出,制度差异总指标与分项指标对进出口贸易量影响的差异明显,为此提出应完善进口贸易制度标准、加大对外宣传力度、保持经济环境的稳定性等建议。

关键词: 丝路经济, “一带一路”倡议, 沿线国家, 制度差异, 进出口贸易, 双边贸易, 引力模型

Abstract: The Belt and Road Initiative plays a strategic role in the foreign trade of China and the countries along the routes, and is an important measure for China to further expand its opening to the outside world. This paper selects trade data of 56 countries along the Belt and Road from 2000 to 2018, using the expansion of the gravity of stochastic frontier model from two aspects: import and export trade to analyze the influence of of institutional differences on trade relations to China and countries along the Belt and Road. The results show that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the total index of institutional differences and China's import and export trade. It shows that the institutional differences within the rationalization scope have a promoting effect on the export trade, and more than the rationalization level will restrain the growth of the export trade and the expansion of the import trade market. In addition, by constructing the sub-index model of institutional differences and comparing it with the total index of institutional difference, it is concluded that the total index of institutional difference and the sub-index of institutional difference have significant differences in the impact on the volume of import and export trade. Therefore, it is suggested to improve the import trade system standard, enhance the external publicity, and ensure the stability of the economic environment.

Key words: Silk Road Economy, the Belt and Road Initiative, Countries along the Belt and Road, Institutional Differences, Import and Export Trade, Bilateral Trade, the Gravity Model

中图分类号:

F752.7

牛君, 卢宇泽. 制度差异对我国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易关系的影响——基于随机前沿引力模型分析[J]. 新疆财经, 2021, (3): 71-80.

Niu Jun, Lu Yuze. The Influence of Institutional Differences on the Foreign Trade Relations between China and the Countries along the Belt and Road —Based on Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model[J]. Finance & Economics of Xinjiang, 2021, (3): 71-80.

参考文献

[1] Soyres F D,Mulabdic A,Murray S,Gaffurri N R,Ruta M.How Much Will the Belt and Road Initiative Reduce Trade Costs?[R].World Bank Policy Research and Applications,2018.
[2] Song M S,Fan X Y,Zhou L J,et al.Study on the Effect of Standards in Promoting the Trade Smoothly Flowing of "The Belt and Road"[J].Standard Science,2018(6):13.
[3] 胡鞍钢,马伟,鄢一龙.“丝绸之路经济带”:战略内涵、定位和实现路径[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014(2):1-11.
[4] 刁莉,邓春慧,李利宇.“一带一路”背景下中国对西亚贸易潜力研究[J].亚太经济,2019(2):61-67+150-151.
[5] 刘爱兰,王智烜,黄梅波.文化差异比制度差异更重要吗?——来自中国对非洲出口的经验证据[J].世界经济研究,2018(10):91-107+137.
[6] Tinbergen J.Suggestions for an International Economics Policy[M].New York:The Twentieth Century Fund,1962.
[7] Beugelsdijk S,Groot H D,Linders G J,et al.Cultural Distance,Institutional Distance and International Trade[A].ERSAConference Papers[C].European Regional Science Association,2004.
[8] Linders G M,Slangen A,De Groot H,Beugelsdijk S.Cultural and Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Flows[Z].Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper,2005.
[9] 潘向东,廖进中,赖明勇.制度因素与双边贸易:一项基于中国的经验研究[J].世界经济,2004(5):26-33.
[10] 潘镇. 制度质量、制度距离与双边贸易[J].中国工业经济,2006(7):45-52.
[11] 朱江丽. 国家距离与中国文化创意产品出口——基于中国与40个贸易伙伴的面板门限分析[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2017(2):43-55.
[12] 阚大学,吕连菊,罗良文.制度差异与我国对外贸易流量的实证研究——基于贸易引力模型[J].经济经纬, 2013(2):55-60.
[13] Kaufmann D,Kraay A,Mastruzzi M.Governance Matters VIII:Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996—2008[Z].World Bank Policy Research Working Paper,2009.
[14] Kogut B,Singh H.The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode[J].Journal of International Business Studies,1988(19):411-432.

[1]	张帅. 我国与“一带一路”沿线国家金融风险传染效应研究——基于金融市场联动视角的实证分析[J]. 新疆财经, 2022, 0(5): 70-80.
[2]	胡颖, 高雅丽. 多维制度差异对中国对外直接投资的影响——基于“一带一路”沿线34个国家数据[J]. 新疆财经, 2022, 0(4): 57-68.
[3]	原帼力, 贾洋洋. 西北五省区推进“一带一路”建设的政策效果对比与评价[J]. 新疆财经, 2022, 0(2): 70-80.
[4]	杨丽华, 谭珉威. 中国对“一带一路”沿线国家对外直接投资绩效研究[J]. 新疆财经, 2022, 0(1): 71-80.
[5]	徐洁香, 万柳琴. 中国OFDI对外贸高质量发展的影响路径研究[J]. 新疆财经, 2021, 0(6): 57-68.
[6]	曹冲, 夏咏. 新疆出口农产品质量测算及驱动因素研究——基于丝绸之路经济带背景[J]. 新疆财经, 2021, 0(6): 69-78.
[7]	唐静, 林嘉纯. 双边教育协定对来华留学生规模的影响研究[J]. 新疆财经, 2021, 0(5): 57-70.
[8]	程云洁, 罗倩. 中美制造业贸易增加值测度及影响因素分析——基于全球价值链视角[J]. 新疆财经, 2021, 0(5): 71-80.
[9]	刘玉飞, 常晓坤. “一带一路”倡议与中国居民家庭消费结构升级——基于准自然实验的双重差分模型分析[J]. 新疆财经, 2021, 0(4): 61-69.
[10]	左正龙. 哈萨克斯坦系统性金融风险预警研究——基于金融压力指数分析[J]. 新疆财经, 2021, 0(4): 70-80.
[11]	杜晓蓉, 周静. 来自中国的借款对“一带一路”沿线国家经济发展的促进效应研究——基于沿线24个国家的实证分析[J]. 新疆财经, 2021, 0(2): 59-70.
[12]	胡颖, 孙迪. 人民币汇率对中国对外直接投资影响的空间计量研究——以“一带一路”沿线国家为例[J]. 新疆财经, 2021, 0(2): 71-80.
[13]	薛领, 张晓林, 张天骄. 新经济地理学视角下地区产品质量的影响因素探讨[J]. 新疆财经, 2021, 0(1): 60-69.
[14]	马远, 张瑞. “一带一路”背景下中国天然气进口贸易效率及潜力分析——基于时变随机前沿引力模型[J]. 新疆财经, 2021, 0(1): 70-80.
[15]	张红涛. 丝绸之路经济带合作安全模式研究[J]. 新疆财经, 2020, 0(6): 48-58.

制度差异对我国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易关系的影响——基于随机前沿引力模型分析

The Influence of Institutional Differences on the Foreign Trade Relations between China and the Countries along the Belt and Road —Based on Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价